Quote from: cryptodevil on February 27, 2019, 08:17:51 PM

Quote from: LEOcoin Foundation on December 19, 2018, 11:43:11 PM

According to the documents filed, Dan is waiting to be removed from the Exit Control List (ECL) in order for him to leave Pakistan. As said before, his work for the LEOcoin Foundation was never in jeopardy.

Roel, it has been quite some time now, could you provide an update on the above?

Also, please would you also advise on the issues raised below:

Quote from: DigitalBadAss on February 22, 2019, 09:23:38 PM

Read up on this!! Here are some highlights

LEO Co-Founder whistleblows on LEO CEO Dan Andersson for:
   Financial irregularities
   Missing money
   Overselling LEOcoin

Andersson fires him to shut him up

See links below for court findings against Andersson.

Meanwhile, Andersson is detained in Pakistan on ECL without Passport for almost 1 year (on another case where he is accused of running a pyramid).

LEO indicates filing insolvency, see link!!!

End result - LEOcoin holders get screwed.

LINKS:

https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions/mr-a-kamran-v-learning-enterprises-organisation-ltd-3324933-2017

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5c6a79eaed915d4a397873ee/Mr_A_Kamran_v_Learning_Enterprises_Organisation_Ltd__-__3324933-2017.pdf

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5c6a79fde5274a72c19f7c73/Mr_A_Kamran_v_Learning_Enterprises_Organisation_Ltd__-__3324933-2017__-_written_reasons.pdf

cryptodevil, I was due to health reasons not able to reply ... but I will have a look at your questions, and at your speculative interpretations ...

As these documents are public and partially could be relevant for the LEOcoin community, I let your post stand. Even when I find your conclusion premature and insinuating. However, I cannot speak for third parties, like mr. Kamran or Learning Enterprises Organisation Ltd. or the like. So, the court will have to decide on matters. I will have to read the documents a few more times, and if I see it necessary, I will add further thoughts.

The documents are obviously from the employment tribunal, but anyway; when you state "court findings against Andersson" I have to point you at the fact, that the allegations made against Mr. Andersson were not subject of this case, nor have they been discussed. They are mentioned as the opinion of Mr- Kamran, not as proven facts. This case was about the abrupt end of the employment relationship and whether or not this was according to employment law. I am not taking any stance on this, as said, and allegations could be true or false. For that reasons I labeled your conclusions as preliminary. Rest assured that we all are following the developments that relate to LEOcoin with great attention.