Quote from: bones261 on March 21, 2019, 06:57:02 PM

Quote from: cryptohunter on March 21, 2019, 06:40:11 PM

@bones
I notice you are now giving merit to people proliferating false information now.

stompix claims "You can't reason with him simply because he doesn't want to reason!!!
He's ruining every damn thread with his whining and false accusation just to attract some of the people here so he can whine more and accuse more, it's a fword never ending a story with him."

amongst other provably false crap and you merit it? are you out of your feeble mind?

Tell him to create a thread listing the false accusations, and present them. Tell him to include the "wall of text that has no meaning" and I will break it down for consumption for the dumbos here.

If not then he is spreading lies and I will start calling him out on it daily until he admits he is talking shit.

Same challenge I give to anyone in meta - bring the the parts of my posts that you can demonstrate are incorrect and present them. That's right none of you can can you? because I am only posting observable events and facts.

As someone who doesn't put you on ignore, I can attest to what I perceive as TLDR posts full of a bunch of vitriol and repetition. What's it to you that I handed out 1 measly merit to that post when I have 500 of these to give out a month?

Quote from: cryptohunter on March 21, 2019, 06:40:11 PM

Anyway back on topic here with bones again.

What do you mean "It would actually be a whole lot easier if they just came out in the open with all the details. At least everyone would have a heads up on what account is in question."

If we know the account in question is sold, we know that anything posted prior to the sale is not their post history. We also know any trust comments earned is not their rightful trust comments. When the deal is done under shroud of darkness, we have no idea what is going on. This is why I am tagging account brokers. They are perpetrating a trade in false reputation on the down low and it's shady.

Quote from: cryptohunter on March 21, 2019, 06:40:11 PM

I will still engage you even though I start to consider you very sneaky lately even though I had previously considered you more genuine than the other clear abusers here.

I should have just ignored you like is recommended in the other thread. Now that I have engaged you, I get the joy of being called feeble minded and sneaky. Engaging with you is about as pleasurable as getting a kick straight in the pants. Did it ever occur to you that people abandon their debates with you because they don't appreciated getting insulted?

Some topics REQUIRE a long post. Also this vitriol is nothing more than being honest. I will not dress up my posts as praise or even being pleasant when I am totally annoyed at the abusers/abuse I am addressing. As I have said to you and anyone else show me the posts I have made that you can demonstrate are incorrect. I present only observable events and facts. People will use any excuse to ignore a truth they don't wish to be universally accepted as true.

Also I find it insulting you are meriting false accusations and observably nonsense riddled vitriol about me. So don't try to act as if I am criticizing you for no reason. What if I merit posts saying your contributions are walls of false information and nonsense. Try to look at things the other way around.

Anyway to get back on topic now...

Well, when you are talking to me in the 1st person and say 'they' I do not know if you mean I should show you who I am referring to. I just wanted clarity on what you were asking for. I was not sure if you were referring to the person advertising the account for sale.

@mikey I am not accusing you of double standards. I have not been that critical of you at all so far. Sure I may have had the odd jab when I think you are pulling a faux rebuttal on me but then I have just passed that off as perhaps inexperience thus far. Others are deliberately abusing the systems of control for their own ends those I will call out at every chance.

I say people must live by the standards they advocate for others simple as that.

If not, then I say any persons advertising accounts sales from now on can not get red paint if the advertised account says no longer for sale nearly a year later.

Thanks to the little bird who delivered this info to me. All these abusers and their pals will be taken down eventually. No double standards DT's must remain.

I'm not sure if I should list the account sale thread here because it will then see this thread spirited away to REP.

Suchmoon already knows about it hence why she tried to derail this thread from the start. Hence why likely TP just got a PM from suchmoon and that vanished too. This is one of their own pals and newly initiated DT fluffer.

I just wanted to see what you all said about it.

This is not just about one person anyway this is a general precedent that I wanted to establish first. If someone advertised an account for sale then months later a message saying it was no longer for sale appeared --then does that get them off the hook or not or do they still get flagged?

If a DT really wants to know who this sold legend account or even DT member is then just ask me to create rep thread and I will post the SALE thread url for them to witness.