Quote from: cAPSLOCK on April 15, 2019, 06:58:57 PM

Quote from: jbreher on April 15, 2019, 05:26:15 PM

Curious is that the delisting does not seem to square with Binance's stated criteria. Of course, CZ is free to do what he wishes with the exchange he owns. But is seems more virtue signaling than adherence to rational criteria.

Quote

When we conduct these reviews, we consider a variety of factors. Here are some that drive whether we decide to delist a digital asset:

   Commitment of team to project
   Level and quality of development activity
   Network / smart contract stability
   Level of public communication
   Responsiveness to our periodic due diligence requests
   Evidence of unethical / fraudulent conduct
   Contribution to a healthy and sustainable crypto ecosystem

I would guess our opinions on this might differ but I would say it meets the bolded quite well. They are calling for the doxing of an individual on the net. No matter how wrong he may or may not have been to call names, that is an egregious move.= and significantly unprofessional *and* unethical. And that is just one example. There is a whole website dedicated to various fraud from one of the leaders.

The listed "factors" apply to "digital asset[ s]".
'They' in your statement (whoever 'they' are) applies to humans.
Certainly, you can discern the difference between digital assets and humans.