Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on September 08, 2011, 03:57:10 AM

Quote from: todu on September 08, 2011, 03:43:18 AM

Quote from: Phinnaeus Gage on September 08, 2011, 03:25:41 AM

Quote from: MoonShadow on September 08, 2011, 02:49:04 AM

Quote from: NF6X on September 08, 2011, 12:26:42 AM

Nah, he was speaking in very general terms about some way to send money, quickly, easily and anonymously to content creators. That's not far off from what he's been evangelizing for decades, so I see no significance in his mentioning it at any particular time in 2009.

Has RMS made any public comments about Bitcoin? In light of his past commentaries, he should have something notable to say about Bitcoin. If his public mentions of such cryptocurrency ideas cease after Bitcoin's metoric rise around October 2010, about the same time that Satoshi disappeared, this might be a significant link.

Where do you want to start? "Richard Stallman" bitcoin --> http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Richard+Stallman%22+bitcoin About 132,000 results

Correlation does not mean causation. A Google search for "Richard Stallman" porn returns 290,000 results, none of which stars Richard as the porn star. According to your logic, it should be about twice as likely that Richard is a porn star than that he is Satoshi.

Surely, you don't think that I didn't know that. Hence the question. With so many results, where do should we start?

You already knew "Richard Stallman" porn returns 290,000 results?

P.S.

Just trolling with you. No suggestion intended.