Quote from: Lauda on June 11, 2019, 09:58:59 PM

I agree. However, excluding >95% of them (especially including the moderator) while educating the remainder seems sustainable to me (at least on DT1 level) which is what I will be doing.

Ok, you do the stick, I'll do the carrot (if I get back to DT1) by including a couple of folks there that I can reasonably determine to be trustworthy.

Quote from: Timelord2067 on June 11, 2019, 10:01:28 PM

I've probably missed reading how @theymos selects the "random" 100, but if he wants to make the list truly random, he should go to random.org and use their list randomiser.

https://www.random.org/lists/

It would mean a small level of manual input but would certainly level the playing field.

I'm willing to bet a limb that theymos' randomiser is sufficiently random... dude's a hardcore bitcoiner.