Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: [NSFW] - phisical violence in DT - "not safe for work" content
by
TECSHARE
on 11/09/2019, 17:38:38 UTC
No one buys your feigned ignorance, especially with you personally pushing 2 or 3 threads
I am sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to say. I am pointing that next users become default trust members/will maybe become DT members:

1)scammers
2)banned accounts
3)hacked accounts
4)inactive accounts

Seems you can't understand this and you see this as personal attack.
To be perfectly frank, if some one had simply politely notified me of this issues, I probably would have just removed him.
FTFY. How many times will you ignore my post?


Vod starting one with a retaliatory negative rating and the rest of the clowns all chiming in at once. This was clearly coordinated.
Of course, my counter to Vod's -ve feedback was also coordinated by clowns.

and the rest of the clowns all chiming in at once. This was clearly coordinated.
negative is not appropriate.
This was also coordinated by clowns.


And back into the sophistry you slip, answering to what you wish I had said instead of what I actually said.  You knew very well I included BitcoinSupremo when you pitched this particular circus tent. Just because you make a few weak ass token attempts at appearing impartial doesn't disguise this.


To be perfectly frank, if some one had simply politely notified me of this issue, I probably would have just removed him. Unfortunately his words were always just a mechanism to target people for their ideas, be it about life in general or the forum. As a result, you are all essentially assuring I CAN'T remove him from my inclusions, because to do so would be to provide validation to and incentivize these coordinated kinds of reputational attacks. So, good job on making the forum a better place to be Piddles, Bozo, and Shakes.

There you have it. It's everyone else's fault that TECSHARE has that dipshit in his trust list.

he's never ever wrong

Not everyone's fault, just a small car full of clowns. Maybe I was wrong about you understanding this ongoing dynamic. It's ok, you will learn.