Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 28, 2019, 06:37:59 AM

So those are concrete evidence of us being scammers? Are you serious ? Grin

No, its evidence that anyone dealing with you as at high risk of losing money.

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 28, 2019, 06:37:59 AM

They owe to the vps provider 10$, not to me.

Another lie, unless you're saying they directly pay the VPS provider $10. Is that what's happening? Besides, why do you need to collect $10 from each client? Shouldn't the total VPS pool from all clients be about $10 for 1 month?

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 28, 2019, 06:37:59 AM

Did we offer the service for free or not?

If you don't ask for $10 or a 30% cut of supposed profits for the first month, then yes, your 1 month free trial is indeed free.

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 28, 2019, 06:37:59 AM

what guarantees you want in trading other than a long term backtested strategy with safe money management? 500% in 20 months is safe and slow.

No, its not. And you have no proof of this. Your "backtest data" is garbage as far as the real world is concerned.

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 28, 2019, 06:37:59 AM

you may not understand why backtest are very important, but win after win, more concrete and bulletproof guarantees add to the stack.

I understand you think everybody should take your word as 100% true.

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 28, 2019, 06:37:59 AM

You don't understand why backtest matters because your jobs is not related to algorithmic trading.

Again, I understand you think everybody should be taking your word at face value, which is hard to do given that you have a propensity to lie and exaggerate.

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 28, 2019, 06:37:59 AM

Can you force yourself to understand that since we EARN ONLY ON PROFITS COMMISSION we have absolutely no interest in faking data and providing a fraud product ?

Another lie. Granted you have at least 2 clients a month, you are profiting by collecting your VPN fees.

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 28, 2019, 06:37:59 AM

We can keep fighting about the 100% win rate definition as much you want. that doesn't change the fact that is 100%.

OMG. You are unable to admit your record has losing trades, despite the evidence being clearly there.

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 28, 2019, 06:37:59 AM

Note that the negative PNLs of 0.0001 mBTC ( 0.001$ loss) are created by instant 1 contracts trades necessary to escape a bug in the bitmex websocket's position endpoint. After several days without trades, the position value restores and the endpoint returns error when trying to access it. This causes the bots to crash. What's the solution until bitmex fixes the problem? Make instant 1 contract trades to unlock the endpoint. That 0.001$ loss is the fee paid as taker(necessary to close the "unlock trade" in less than 1 second) and the mathematical loss that come from the 0.5$ of spread between the ask and the bid.

If its a "winning trade" then why does it yield a negative return?

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 28, 2019, 06:37:59 AM

Quote

Nobody's saying its impossible to profit with a trading bot.

UHM, SORRY? I had pages of fights about this. Here's a little extra:

There's a clear difference between "a profit" and "constant profits." You don't even know that you can generate constant profits. Whatever works for you this month might not even work the next. Like I told you, you can point to your backtest data all you want and people can decide for themselves if they want to trust your word or not. Regardless, it comes down to a matter of trust, and absolutely nothing more.

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 28, 2019, 06:37:59 AM

Quote from: mindrust on September 20, 2019, 07:23:17 PM

Successful traders don't use bots. The best way to become a successful trader is, doing less trades.

The less you trade, the more successful you become.

That's why, the best traders are who do zero trades, hodlers.

Again, clearly not the same thing as saying "impossible."

Quote from: CryptoSparks on September 28, 2019, 06:37:59 AM

Quote

Like I tried to say earlier before TS derailed the conversation, come back when you have several months of verifiable trade history under your belt and then we'll talk again.

Imagine someone, unfortunately, kills suchmoon. Police come and take you from your home, exposing you at family, co-workers, and media as the bloody spineless murderer.

Even if you have a bulletproof alibi and there are no evidence that you have beaten suchmoon to death, the jury sends you to prison with a sentence:

"Meanwhile go to prison, if we catch the real murderer we will get you out of there don't worry."

This is what all the CryptoSparks' hunt looks like.

This is an idiotic, overly dramatic and non-applicable comparison. Nobody put you in prison, jackass. We're just trying to warn others that you are exhibiting untrustworthy behavior that has more in common with scammers than people offering legitimate services.

I'm thoroughly bored now of you arguing in circles with me and am not giving you any more free exposure.

Have a terrific day.