Quote from: jumiapaul on October 10, 2019, 05:11:24 AM

Quote from: em777 on October 09, 2019, 11:57:10 AM

Quote from: jumiapaul on October 09, 2019, 02:25:18 AM

Quote from: Ace44 on October 08, 2019, 09:03:25 PM

I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here

I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat.

Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business

I'll suggest that deepcloud should channel their efforts in searching for more partnerships and listing of their tokens in other exchange platform. I just feel there's no point crying over a spilled milk, since the delisting has been made. If they wanted to make amends it should be before the project was delisted. Now that the worst has been done, let them find a way to move on.

You have a point but i believe they are doing this just to get back the confidence of the community by clarifying the issue, like i stated earlier,the damage has already been done, so they need to think more of a semi re-branding plan to get things up and running, the way i see it, there is no resolution happening between the 2 brands and like you stated, is best to look into other exchanges