Quote from: o_e_l_e_o on October 23, 2019, 08:11:58 AM

Requiring two or more DT2 members does little to nothing to address the problem of sockpuppets. A DT1 user can make as many DT2 users as he likes. One malicious DT1 user could quite easily create/find multiple accounts to add to DT2 to achieve their desired result.

Thanks for pointing that out, I was meant to include the following requirement for DT2 exclusion too but forgot:

Must be distrusted more than trusted by DT2 members
Must have distrust greater than 2 DT2 members
Distrusting DT2 members must be trusted by different DT1 members

This would resolve the sockpuppet problem unless I'm agian mistaken. OP updated again.

Quote from: Coolcryptovator on October 23, 2019, 06:25:04 AM

If a DT2 can't include you DT2 then how he will exclude you.

Same as a DT1 member can't include another DT1 member, but can (collectively) exclude them.

Quote from: Coolcryptovator on October 23, 2019, 06:25:04 AM

And if DT2 voting is enough to become DT2 [...]

Again, this is not what I said. To avoid regurgitation:

Quote from: dragonvslinux on October 23, 2019, 01:25:28 AM

With this proposal, DT2 depth would still be chosen by DT1.