Quote from: mvdheuvel1983 on November 07, 2019, 12:05:41 PM

No one knows dahil everyone remains anonymous here. Uulitin ko even banks and gonverment can't help anything dahil it is blockchain guys. They can stop the next upcoming generation, susunod hindi na kailangan ng paper money, I doubt it.

Nahilo naman ako dito, ano ba talaga ibig sabihin nito? conflicting ang dalawang magkasunod na sentence na tumutukoy sa isang subject. Tapos yung sundot na sentence sa huli lalong nagpagulo.

Blockchain is only a ledger, or records of data,

Quote

a system in which a record of transactions made in bitcoin or another cryptocurrency are maintained across several computers that are linked in a peer-to-peer network.

Actually there is nothing new except Bitcoin implement a decentralized immutable records of transaction for transparency and with regards to paper money, I agree that it will eventually become obsolete just like the barter trading pero it will take probably centuries pa kasi marami pang bansa ang walang kakayanan para sa cashless society.

Quote from: npredtorch on November 07, 2019, 12:51:14 PM

I think ang pinaka point na sinasabi dyan ay hindi yung volume (though kasama na din ito), kundi yung pag verify at pag process.
An evidence na passive at more usable ang bitcoin compare to fiat in terms of using it for a transaction.

Indeed hindi lang volume ang sinasabi dun sa tweet but the thing is majority ng transaction na iyan ay posibleng nanggaling sa exchanges. Like nung sinabi sa earlier reply, it includes the Ins and out so ibig sabihin, possible na nadoble ang bilang ng isang bitcoin transaction. It would be great if they provide a detailed statistics. Ang nangyari kasi eh parang speculation lang ang dating ng tweet.