I said in the first reply itself, that thinking along these lines is a subjective judgement. (Like what if a newbie said the same thing?) Also, thinking from the viewpoint of the developers behind this.
There could have been a problem trusting a newbie's initial report but in this case roobet confirmed what yahoo62278 is saying so I don't really see how that's an issue with his rank or standing or whatever you're still trying to ascribe to this. And sure, the viewpoint of the developer is "don't pay out", no surprises here. I also suspect even their "official" max bets are way to high for their bankroll, they know little about risk management, and even less about software QA, but that's neither here nor there.
Despite that, he raised a flag on them.
He didn't raise a flag as far as I can see.
If its completely about being an upright user and holding the casino to "technical standards" then shouldn't we just rely on the TOS for that?
There are many shitty things that can be done while staying within TOS (which I could rant about for 4 more pages - they should really talk to a lawyer and to a person who knows English) and this is one such thing.
I know its not a popular opinion. Its only natural that there is groupism. Yet, when post after post refuses to acknowledge that Yahoo as a user was well aware of this. He got paid 2K. Good for him. Yet, raising a flag like this isn't entirely justified. And IF it is for the benefit of the community, then he shouldn't make it about him getting paid. On a forum like this, people with influence should be held to better standards and, ideally, vice-versa. I have ranted about this in my earlier replies too and I get it that its more of an ideological debate. And its not just groupism that I mentioned.
Again, he didn't raise a flag and he presented his claim in a fairly reasonable way. Nobody else piled on with flags or negatives either. You're way off base here. Multiple users saying things that don't align with your own opinion doesn't mean there is a conspiracy here.
No, your post does not address the irrefutable points that I made above. HE knew the conditions , HE accepted the conditions, HE fucked up and brought into play the conditions HE knew HE agreed to operate under.
Get it now?
as we mentioned before
Which POINTS do you want to refute ...
HE knew the conditions , HE accepted the conditions, HE fucked up and brought into play the conditions HE knew HE agreed to operate under.Also he called them scammers and raised a scammer accusation. I suspect that is what the other guy meant.
Since yahoo seems to be not demanding the entire winnings and only a bug finding fee. I think even 500bucks -1000bucks would be MORE than fair although of course they need not pay anything. Now that he is sounding less greedy in spite of his own willingness to operate under the known conditions and then go and fuck up and bring those conditions to bear on himself.... 1k is way more than he really deserves. I think if it was me I would not have said anything publicly but may have suggested I get the over betting amount back from them in priv. However would have accepted no if that is their answer. They did pay the 2k and not make up some excuses not to refund the bet and cancel the winnings ... that would have been shady.