You screw someone twice over by bringing out a "bug" you already knew about, incredibly lucky or not, you can be sure as hell they won't speak to you..
This was never a bug. Some sites do allow you to place a bet over max profit and some don't. The system we had in place allowed you to place these bets
They knowingly allowed player to place bet, yahoo placed whole $300+. They accepted that bet. So how OP screwed them? He won?
Yahoo single-handedly manages some of the lowest paying services out here, and works on the principle of "Quantity over Quality" himself.
Why is this relevant for this thread? Pretend it is some newbie account who is gambling for first time.
Given that the maximum win is $2000 and that the maximum bet whilst maintaining house edge (in this particular instance) is $55.55, shouldn't yahoo get $2000 + ($323.949 - $55.55)?
If it is stated (not hidden) that max profit is $2000 and they calculated $55.55 for that bet, then player actually made $2000 - $55 = 1944.45 profit. It is either not $2000 or they messed up while calculating bet amount.
Maybe they wanted to say maximum win amount? Nah, confirmed, it is profit:
In regards to being able to bet an amount that should pay over our $2,000 max profit set in place.