They're doing a shit job at promoting.
Ach,
succès de scandale, or there's no such thing as bad publicity, as the old saying goes. It's the same as we see with every single ICO/token that's launched on here; a thread full of sockpuppets isn't appealing to any serious user, but it will drum up interest among the idiots. Same thing with the Cryptotalk campaign; their endless spam just annoys serious users, but might pique the interest of newbies.
Very true. The fact that BSV is discussed, and their thread gets replies regularly is good for their exposure. That's all that really matters, not the content of the discussion. Any attention generated here is good for them.
Are you saying it's an actual strategy? To me it looks like just some garbage generated by an unhinged sockpuppeting troll, and if someone gets fooled by that then I'd argue they would be sending money to a Nigerian prince if not for BSV.
I'd rather have them waste their time in that stupid thread than reading months of complaints in Meta if they get banned but maybe that's just me.
As for banning the troll, it would be more peaceful around here if we could definitively connect all trolls to banned accounts.
I'm not holding my breath for any serious enforcement of ban evasions now that we have ban-evading DT members.