Quote from: TECSHARE on March 01, 2020, 06:30:44 AM

Quote from: nutildah on March 01, 2020, 04:12:22 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on March 01, 2020, 02:28:04 AM

Quote from: suchmoon on March 01, 2020, 01:36:35 AM

~

Thank you for finally answering my questions directly.

Idiot. Your questions were directly answered days ago:

Quote from: suchmoon on February 27, 2020, 03:54:35 AM

Quote from: TECSHARE on February 27, 2020, 03:29:37 AM

Is the rating I left for Vod valid or not? Are the ratings he left for me valid or not?

No and no.

You have passed the threshold from being subjectively to objectively a tool. You did this in order to play your stupid game of "gotcha," which you already lost.

I don't understand why anybody would conduct business with you knowing they run the risk of enduring your hard-headed stupidity if even the smallest nuance of a transaction should go awry, or even be debatable.

Actually the response was incomplete and ambiguous. "No" as in I refuse to answer? No as in your rating is not valid? No as in his rating is not valid? That was not an answer. There is no "gotcha" games, simply asking Suchmoon to clearly define their position, and pointing out that they are in fact supporting a trust system abuser based on their own words.

I do trades with people all the time, and I make sure each of my customers is happy, and always make sure I meet all of the obligations I agreed to. In between the abusive trust system ratings in attempt to silence criticism, you will find multiple pages of happy traders, but I am sure your little character impugning attacks are more convincing. Keep tryharding Nutilduuuuh. Maybe you can make up some more stories for tomorrow.

Only a fool or someone incredibly dishonest would not consider "no" to be an answer to a "yes" or "no" question. So which one are you? Because you are definitely one or the other, if not both.