Quote from: 121425366@qq.com on Today at 10:58:58 AM

Quote from: LoyceV on Today at 08:46:25 AM

Quote from: 121425366@qq.com on Today at 08:16:19 AM

With the development of stain analysis technology, one day chipmixer.com Anonymity may be broken!

Let's count (potential) chips, which is all addresses funded with a specific amount. From List of all Bitcoin addresses with a balance:
1 mBTC: 265288 addresses
2 mBTC: 67005 addresses
4 mBTC: 30375 addresses
8 mBTC: 15431 addresses
16 mBTC: 7897 addresses
32 mBTC: 3878 addresses
64 mBTC: 1678 addresses
128 mBTC: 1155 addresses
256 mBTC: 597 addresses
500 mBTC: 37896 addresses
512 mBTC: 347 addresses
1000 mBTC: 88063 addresses
1024 mBTC: 338 addresses
2048 mBTC: 114 addresses
4096 mBTC: 145 addresses
8192 mBTC: 57 addresses
I made a similar list 12 days ago.
Disclaimer: this counts the total remaining balance, so addresses with more than 1 input or even outputs are also included.

I found that there are many bitcoin addresses for integers, such as 1btc, 0.5btc, 1M, 2m, 4m, 8m. Each integer bitcoin address has tens of thousands of addresses. If you hide yourself in tens of thousands of addresses. It is really impossible to trace the major breakthrough factors in the analysis of the combined confrontation chain,,,

I'm a novice. Do you mean the more addresses the chips are, the more anonymous they are？
1 mBTC: 265288 addresses
2 mBTC: 67005 addresses
4 mBTC: 30375 addresses
8 mBTC: 15431 addresses
500 mBTC: 37896 addresses
1000 mBTC: 88063 addresses