Quote from: actmyname on Today at 08:07:34 PM

Quote from: Steamtyme on Today at 07:17:24 PM

Quote from: actmyname on Today at 06:29:32 PM

How are you going to approve one withdrawal and then decline the next?
How are you going to state, "this user is multi-accounting," but only after they attempt to withdraw?
How are you going to determine that a user is multi-accounting when they have only placed a single bet?

Sportsbet.io needs to determine whether an account was created against the ToS either before any bets are accepted or before the account is created.

Answer those questions three and look at the gambler's plea.

I wonder if it doesn't come down to timing and processing. I don't know how quickly they attempt to verify an account after it's created and/or places a bet. Could be that an account gets flagged after the withdrawal processes based on the withdrawal method (linked accounts/addresses)

The point of my post was to create an exhaustive list.

If the accounts are flagged after withdrawing, then the evidence must come from the details provided during the withdrawal. Otherwise, where was the evidence?
If the details provided were of a Bitcoin address, then Sportsbet.io better have some damning blockchain evidence.
If the details provided were of a FIAT withdrawal, then Sportsbet.io should have already known this when the user deposited with his card.

If the evidence was discovered after the user created the account and deposited, then they should never have been able to place a bet.

As far as I'm concerned, any time Sportsbet.io authorizes a bet, they are creating a contract between them and the player: the loser of the bet must pay up. They must provide a reasonable justification for doing otherwise.

As I said above, the deposit and withdrawal methods were the same every time. So how can be explained the first approved withdrawal request?