Quote from: Timelord2067 on Today at 05:54:30 AM

Quote from: nullius on October 21, 2020, 06:33:33 AM

...

For someone all of a sudden hero worshiping @Lauda

LOLWUT. Are you both blind and mentally retarded? I have been consistently heroine-worshipping Lauda for years! Creating Lauda stories, Lauda fan art, Lauda satires, Lauda catbat witch memes and Lauda+Terminator memes... “All of a sudden”?

eddie13, I hope you don’t mind if I cherry-pick a salutary quote from you here:

Quote from: eddie13 on January 19, 2020, 08:53:54 PM

Quote from: nullius on January 19, 2020, 08:32:59 PM

[...]

Lauda
Lauda
Lauda [3]
Lauda

[...]

[3] Man you talk about lauda an awfull lot..

http://HowManyTimesHasNulliusPostedLaudaToday.tk/ ??

lol 68 hits

Quote from: Timelord2067 on Today at 05:54:30 AM

you're biting the hand that feeds given Royse777 only just removed their distrust of @Lauda

“Hand that feeds”? How the fuck could Royse777 have any practical effect on either me or Lauda?

Oh, yes: You, a well-known deranged troll, live in a delusional fantasy that DT must be somehow important to me.

Lauda is “banned in the same way as satoshi”, in case you didn’t notice. And the suggestion that anybody here is “the hand that feeds” her is conceited and disgusting. Fuck you.

Smart people will arguably keep including her, so as to keep seeing her valuable tags. (Lack of maintenance is a problem, but I think that’s outweighed by the amount of real trouble prevented by Lauda’s tags.) For my part, I think that anyone who distrusts Lauda is too stupid to be worth worrying about.

Quote from: Timelord2067 on Today at 05:54:30 AM

... (and you're playing @Vod and @OgNasty against each-other as evidenced in the two links you provided) ...

Mr Nasty is a well-known trust abuser.

Back on topic—the point that Timelord evaded:

Quote from: nullius on October 21, 2020, 06:33:33 AM

Royse777, you have exceedingly poor judgment. Why would you step up to defend somebody who creates a self-moderated thread accusing somebody, and then deletes the one and only response of the accused, leaves in place your arguments against me, and locks the thread? (In my own self-moderated Reputation threads, I have always been at pains to make it clear that the accused shall have a reasonable opportunity to speak for himself. Even cretins whom I utterly despise.)