I already wondered why you are reacting so aggressively and defending Betcoin, but since you are their campaign leader, that explains a lot.
I would just ignore Hhamphuz's opinion, because he is their campaign manager and will never fail them. His message can not be taken to serious. There are plenty of people who agree with you.
I find it curious that you are leaping to dismiss Hhampuz
ad hominem, when at least on this page, besides blowing off RichGang and BTCGOLD, his only substantive argument what I also said:
Let’s see what the neutral third-party mediator says.(I also find it curious that you both (BTCGOLD, codegnome) have credible-looking trust-page accusations of defending scams—though I can’t be bothered to look further now; maybe later.)
I have no financial interest in anyone here. And I am not here because of Hhampuz, either; this thread came to my attention due to someone else. I just think that it makes sense to see what a neutral third-party mediator says after reviewing the evidence. None of the people flame-warring here has suggested any reason to do otherwise. And although I know that an OP in a non-self-moderated thread cannot necessarily control the behaviour of others, it looks pretty bad when a bunch of accounts make a mud-slinging brigade with rapid-fire repeats of stuff that has already been said.
Does everybody who is following this thread
really need to wade through so many pointless posts, whilst awaiting further developments? You know, trying to attract attention that way can backfire.