Quote from: Timelord2067 on Today at 08:17:10 AM

Quote from: leventturksoy on Today at 05:29:39 AM

Can you not use the raw transaction in the first post?

That's the "old" transaction (with the higher transaction fee) that gets rejected for a variety of fees (such as too high fee).

Quote from: nc50lc on Today at 07:49:36 AM

It will get rejected due to another reason: "too high fees". That includes blockcypher.

I've already tried posting that TX (see post from about a week ago which includes screen grabs of various nodes rejecting that TX)

Quote from: nc50lc on November 04, 2020, 06:11:37 AM

Quote from: leventturksoy on November 04, 2020, 03:07:02 AM

How can there be a slim chance? Should I keep re-broadcasting in hopes that a small miner would accept it?

Yes,
Since 150+ nodes are still accepting it, there's a 'very very slim' chance that it will get into a mining nodes' mempool (that also accepts such transactions).
But re-broadcasting it after getting dropped isn't worth it, IMO.

I don't mind trying to broadcast the newer (lower fee paid) given there has been reports that the first TX has fallen out of the mempool and/or was never accepted in the first place.

Quote from: nc50lc on Today at 07:49:36 AM

He needs the one with the normal fee.

#Persistence

Okay, one with lower fee:

01000000000101c0ee957139541ad18cb3367a4dd0606bbc8c5bd1585ce64e813c5c21359e3f6e0 000000017160014ef3247d77adecb1f22692e899931e75e1a5cbb26ffffffff01e63d0423000000 0017a9146b4e110311345ba00ff2bb77d569e7f4a0651c6387024830450221008467643b0f6be6b 9c47020bbc824908b5b391a752e416fefcba597d2be1ad5db02200756619fe6db4bcd694dbee6e0 fdc332f06a7b187dd3de6e756c6f7c21d3bdde0141044b8d17d6f5fae04c9213da069f4e9fdd25d f5f567f867a6a957a850c45a602b788c4a699afacbca54cfc5ba0cd659f20575f2fb20eee6ed73c f8bb7dd95e3fd200000000