Quote from: HashFast_CL on March 07, 2014, 12:46:16 AM

As of right now, all the Cointerra has done is make 1.3TH/s boxes into 1.6TH/s boxes with new firmware

Quote from: HashFast_CL on March 07, 2014, 12:50:57 AM

Yes, it is unbelievable that HashFast beat Cointerra to demonstrating a 2TH/s miner, especially since Cointerra advertised "500GH/s" chips and was supposedly the ASIC Dream Team.

Even more unvelievable is that HashFast's Sierra EVO only uses 3 chips to get 2TH/s, while Cointerra's uses 4 and only gets ~1.6 (if you're lucky).

What a treat to unveil our 2TH/s beast in Austin, right in Cointerra's back yard! Cool

Quote from: HashFast_CL on March 07, 2014, 01:45:55 AM

OTOH, Cointerra's chip is still being misrepresented as "500GH/s" when it actually only gets about 400GH/s. Even after a two month delay, they couldn't get their machines to run at the promised 2TH/s. The only company in the world selling mining equipment that really hashes at 2TH/s is HashFast (hence our name).

Quote from: HashFast_CL on March 08, 2014, 08:29:04 AM

True or False: CoinTerra's first ASIC's Hash-Rate is greater than 500 GH/s?

Quote from: HashFast_CL on March 08, 2014, 08:53:00 AM

This is the Custom Hardware subforum. We are supposed to discuss things like

-HashFast ASIC specs (original 400GH/s goal met, now up to 800GH/s)
-Cointerra ASIC specs (much less than original 500GH/s target)

Quote from: HashFast_CL on March 10, 2014, 06:01:56 PM

In other news, Cointerra *did not* demonstrate a working 2.1TH/s miner in Austin at last week's Bitcoin Conference, or anywhere else. Ever.

I'm confused. Is this the Cointerra thread? Why does HF_CL keep talking about Cointerra, Cointerra, Cointerra?

I bought a HF product. Please ship it.