Quote from: VanityWallets2015 on Today at 10:25:01 AM

The truth is, you only are interesting accusatin and reputation topic from Adkinsbet, trying to give them a bad name. Since you work for Sportsbet.io, it is very relevant. To be sure that Sportsbet.io, together with Bitcasino.io, will now also receive the necessary attention Wink

You can be sure about that.
That is going to be interesting. As for your position at Sportsbet.io, the posts below are definitely posted by you for fun? There are dozens in which you give an update about the field of participants.

I'll give you the archived links to where I sourced the data: they were compiled from Sportsbet.io's public list back when the event was takking place, but my question is what this has to do with AdkinsBet.

Thanks to all the random Sportsbet.io attention, I'm able to quote one of the posts where I admonish their ToS in the exact same way I admonish AdkinsBet's Terms and Conditions, something that is relevant to this thread:

Quote from: actmyname on August 07, 2020, 10:07:59 AM

Quote from: nutildah on August 07, 2020, 07:58:35 AM

Wrongdoing isn't necessarily the same thing as "not fair," but in my eyes, it is fair because the user agreed to those terms of service upon registration, and their deposit was returned so they didn't actually lose any money

I want you to consider the two states of reality from before OP deposited to after OP was returned money.

Prior to deposit: No bets have been made. Balance is X.
After return: Bets have been made. Balance is X.

The fact that Sportsbet.io accepted bets means that they were willing to take the player's money in the case of a loss. Given that the player has instead won, the casino is now instead liable to pay up. Unfortunately, due to them using their arbitrary ToS, they are able to quote a clause that gives them absolute discretion and they are able to essentially nullify the player's wins.

Now imagine this. X:

I offer you a bet. If you win, I freeze your winnings and return your deposit. If you lose, I take your money. I cover details allowing me to arbitrarily freeze balances if I consider you a negative to my casino in a clause outlined within the ToS. You agreed to this. I can now act accordingly to everyone else who agrees to the ToS, because of course, contracts are all-encompassing and if you were too stupid to read it then you deserve to get scammed. Lol, what a bunch of newbie dimwit losers for me to take advantage of by documenting binding legal contracts. They can do nothing about it. That's because rules are rules, and if you accept it then you're vulnerable to every small part of the clauses.

If the next post is going to be another bad-faith deflection and unrelated to AdkinsBet, then I see no point in continuing the discussion about AdkinsBet as the topic would have shifted to that of useless bickering. I'm okay with that - trolls rarely get banned after all - but it's a question as to how long this charade will be kept up.

Quote from: yayayo on Today at 10:31:39 AM

In any case, you have the time to read the Adkinsbet terms and conditions all day long and compare them with the previous ones. People who have no interest in an organization are not going to spend all their time in it.

It took me about 5 minutes to take the archive and write "diff adkins_1 adkins_2". What does this have to do with the contents?