Quote from: Richy_T on Today at 10:56:16 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 09:14:08 PM

Have you gotten over your BIG blocker afflictions and your disgruntledment towards the real deal king daddy bitcoin that has segwit and relatively (speaking) eee widddy bitty blocks?

Nope. I still say that increasing on-chain transaction capacity is the way forward. It has proven that BCH and Amaury Sachet were not able to cut it (and let's not even bother with BSV). However, I continued to honor my position of never counting BTC out so other than a little spendy-spend to realize some profits, my holdings are mostly intact. All that's really been lost is that segwit is now a permanent canker on the protocol. I'm considering writing a Medium article about it.

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 09:14:08 PM

Probably if you apologize - for burning bridges, that might be a step in the right direction.. Maybe you can do what Adam was not willing to do and admit that your claims of censorship were overblown and in the end not correct? that might help. Wink

you will thank me, later. Tongue

They were undeniably correct and I stand by what I said completely. I don't know what bridges I am supposed to have burned, I'm just a dweeb posting on an online forum.

Ahh good to know that with all that drama yet you stayed true to BTC. But a lot of people actually followed through and got burned hard after they exchanged their BTC for the ever diminishing alt bag. (Not to mention being on the same side with Faketoshi for some time) Regardless, something something about bygones being bygones