Damn, too bad.  That was a pretty good post and I would have merited it without checking for plagiarism....so I'm glad you found out that it was plagiarized before I got suckered.

Gotta be careful with lower-ranked members making very detailed, very well-written posts on this forum.  It's unfortunate that such skepticism is needed when evaluating their posts, but the fact is--and has been for years--that most people who are new to bitcointalk are in it for the money and don't take the time to write out such technical posts as the one by kxwhakexk, and that's assuming they had the ability to write that well in English to begin with.

When I first registered for an account, my goal was to become a legendary member，I also try my best to do this, replying to 7-8 posts on average every day.But now for me, merit is a secondary aspect，The more important thing is to learn knowledge and make good friends in the forum！But I don't regret that I have suffered those words before. Maybe after many years, it will be interesting to see my naive reply in my newbie period again.

Thank you very much for trusting me, I am definitely not active in bitcointalk for bounty. I reviewed my previous post. It does have similarities with the post pointed out by icopress.

The DSA content I posted was not copied directly from the link he pointed out.As I said in the article, I am not a native English speaker. It is still difficult for me to read articles in pure English.

My purpose in posting this post is to hope that others can point me out mistakes so that I can learn better. But unfortunately this is suspected of plagiarism.I won't make the same mistake again in the future. About technical posts, I will read more and less reply.

I found the previous manuscript. I do have a step-by-step verification.Not plagiarism for merit！


I am also trying to learn programming knowledge to better understand everything about Bitcoin.


Thanks again to everyone who helped me correct my mistakes！