Quote from: Plutosky on Today at 04:18:01 PM

Il dato più interessante manca, da dove arriveranno le cifre necessarie per questo incremento.

Al contrario di Plutosky, il mio weekend è stato piuttosto movimentato.
Quindi no ho tempo di risospondere a questa domanda, ma il mio pensiero è ben riassunto da un'ottimo post di @JayJuanGee in ripostoa al solito meme.
Non condivido le percentuali al 100%, ma il ragionamento alla fine è corretto.

Quote from: JayJuanGee on Today at 06:48:29 PM

Quote from: shahzadafzal on Today at 06:06:31 PM

$TTTT9k

“Bitcoin. Will. Go. Higher. Than. You. Think.”

https://twitter.com/dennis_porter_/status/1444426345388265476?s=21

I will admit that this image presents a very interesting way of overviewing the at-issue values in front of us, and part of the calculation concern would be that value is being stored in asset classes that are very inefficient as storage of value and even inferior in terms of their storage of value attributes.
Even if bitcoin were to such a decent amount of the value out of several of those other less efficient/inferior storage of value for the reasons already mentioned, most of them would likely still hold some value in terms of their utility value and/or still retain value because people might conclude (perhaps wrongly) that they are better storages of value than king daddy.

So perhaps bitcoin's addressable market would be some kind of fraction of the total value of some of those other assets (or some fraction of all of them combined.. I am not sure what that would be, but it would neither be 100% nor zero.. and some portion of them.. including that it probably has already begun to absorb some of the value - even though small amounts since bitcoin still remains less than $1 trillion and also in the ballpark of .05% of the value of all of them combined ..

I created the below explanatory table as a means to perhaps help me to better attempt to illustrate the point that I am attempting to make through words.. and a table might be better to also allow others to tweak the numbers where they might find better ways of figuring out some estimations of the valuations matter.

Type    Current value($Trillions)    multiple of inefficiencies    Value into BTC ($Trillions)
Derivatives    $900.000    50%    $450.000
Real Estate    $220.000       60%       $132.000
Stocks    $90.000       50%       $45.000
Bonds    $130.000       60%       $78.000
currencies    $120.000       90%       $108.000
gold    $11.000       75%       $8.250
silver    $1.200       75%       $0.900
crypto    $1.000       50%       $0.500

Total    $1,473.200                  $822.650

In essence, I am just attempting a quickie SOMA valuation of the inefficiencies, so feel free to tweak my valuations - including my multiples of what I had ballpark considered the inefficiencies to potentially be...

Even with my attempt at a ballpark figure, once all these valuation matters play themselves out and value ends up flowing into BTC (over the years to come based on those above approximations), we still end up getting bitcoin to be future valued around 822x of today's prices..