Quote from: Raflesia on Today at 05:54:13 PM

Quote from: qwertyup23 on Today at 04:39:15 PM

-snip- Is this being regulated by the country you are setting up? To be honest, lots of potential customers are lost with this implementation alone; I do hope that you at least create a compromise where customers would be able to recover or at least receive a compensation for this.

Though every customer has the free will to decide which gambling website to pursue, with tons of online gambling websites also available in the internet, you are severely limiting your customers; thus reducing your potential profit.

Maybe it's because of state regulations because we don't know and so there's no compromise for this KYC because I don't know if they have a lot of customers with this KYC implementation?
I'll see some feedback from other people who have played on vikingbet to comment on this so I guess a lot of people are still debating it including myself, for me small users certainly won't take a look at it.

Operating regulated casino has a lot of responsibility and most comply to some state requirement before being given a certificate to operate KYC I a must to many of such casinos, but most crypto users don't feel free giving out their identity to a third party which is why KYC compliance discourages a lot of anonymous players.
But we also have some regulated casinos with a lot of users who have gone through the KYC process and gotten verified.