Quote from: TwitchySeal on Today at 06:13:14 AM

Quote from: edgycorner on Today at 05:13:11 AM

Quote from: TwitchySeal on Today at 04:31:50 AM

Quote from: JasonXIII on June 07, 2022, 06:53:57 AM

Moreover I don't understand why you are saying in your feed back the accusations are fake while it's not denied that the funds deposited by the plaintiff have been illegally seized by the casino.

On a brand new forum account, OP claimed funds were frozen for having multiple accounts and winnings were mainly from slots.

Stake is a casino, Sportsbetting or slots. It doesn't matter how a punter makes his money in a casino, as long as it's made through legit bets. It would be harder for OP to prove the legitimacy of their winnings if it was slots, but with sports-betting there are bet slips(which can be accessed publicly on stake) + OP has provided all the betslips as evidence long before stunna made their first reply(check imgur link). Making it very hard to deny the legitimacy of their winnings.

You're responding to allegations that haven't been made.

After being limited, OP used multiple accounts to get around the limit. That's the allegation. Stake said "we don't want your action over $X" and OP pretended to be multiple different people and then wagered more than the limit.

The same question arises again,
If it is indeed true, then why did it only become a problem when they were winning.
A player is free to break rules, as long as they are losing? But once someone starts to win, the winning customer will be put under a microscope to find any faults and will be held liable for them without providing any verifiable evidence to back their claims(Since Stunna has already said they won't give any evidence about how connections b/w these accounts were made)?

There would have been no problem from Stake's side if OP lost all of their deposit(100k), why would it be? In a way, OP was playing a losing game. It's a violation of trust and a predatory practice.

I am also curious about why their previous accounts(if any), were limited or banned. Did they break a rule?

They played a fair game and won the money through legit bets. They are ready to verify their identity. I even asked for a video verification for my own purpose(to make sure I wasn't supporting an impostor). For obvious reasons I won't share the video here, it should be OP's choice.

If Stake can prove that OP was involved in something illicit (with evidence) then Stake should at least return their full deposit back.

If they can't provide evidence or prove anything, then OP deserves all of their balance(deposit+profit)