If everything turns out to be proven then that would really be the ending of any casinos or businesses out there but it turns out that some accusations are just simply trolling or trying out to ruin other sites reputation but the community arent that dumb to believe into something which hadnt been proved out which it would be mostly be ignored thats why anyone who do make out some accusations couldnt really get that sympathy unless if its been proven out but if not then expect that you would be ignored.
Accusations must be valid to make sense. Flag must be supported enough by DT members to make sense. If accusations or flags are invalid, they are not make sense and can not affect reputation of a casino.
This is very much true. Unless a flag is supported by DT members it does not carry enough weight. Moreover, some scam accusations are often from newbies who doesn't know how the system works or who deliberately want to fault the reputation of the company. That is why when such accusations are true, DT members tend to take it up from them and create the necessary flags and tags.
But on the other hand, it is better to have a clean review of reputation than to have some messy feedbacks even if they don't have weight.