Quote from: ETFbitcoin on Today at 09:29:24 AM

Quote from: Wind_FURY on Today at 06:11:17 AM

Quote from: ETFbitcoin on August 18, 2022, 11:34:21 AM

--snip--

Off-topic? Do we actually need to establish the fact that WasabiWallet's pool = also its users? I'm sorry, I thought you already understood that, and that we're on the same page in that matter.

I do not consider owner/operator of Wasabi CoinJoin coordinator as user. To be specific, i'm talking about Wasabi Wallet user who use CoinJoin feature.

Quote from: Wind_FURY on Today at 06:11:17 AM

But anyway, whether right or wrong, whether you agree or disagree, the point is nopara37 accepted the trade off, and the users also have a choice if they want to accept the trade off. Because anyone can use another mixer that doesn't blacklist outputs, or another team can run another coordinator that doesn't blacklist outputs.

I get the point, although i have to remind that,

1. Some user probably don't know about blacklist.
2. Most user doesn't even aware you can switch to different coordinator.

I believe that's a debate for another topic.

Plus to make myself and where I stand clear, I don't believe you are wrong in disagreeing in WasabiWallet's acceptance of taking the trade off, and blacklisting "tainted" outputs, or outputs used for "illegal transactions". I understand your debate in the matter because "taint" truly doesn't exist in the blockchain. BUT, with government sanctions on computer programs, services and public wallets, I'm merely making a point that it's up to the user/service if he/she/they want to accept those trade offs, or not.