Quote from: PX-Z on Today at 01:56:35 PM

Having negative trust rating on this forum doesn't mean that all his actions outside this forum should be considered as not true, lie, etc. About proofs, check his post history, or thread posted its all over there.

No one had said that his actions outside this forum are not true as no one cared whatever he does outside the forum as well as outside his case against Stake. In regard to proofs, OP have not mentioned any proof as well other than his denial with the accusation on his match making issue with Stake.

Quote from: PX-Z on Today at 01:56:35 PM

People should stop defending a service if the accusation is true no matter how reputed it is, or the case were closed but with unreasonable solution. Despite the attacked of some or most people here to OP of submitting fake KYC, they just blindly believe Stake about the claim of match fixing without no strong evidence given. Lol.

It's not about defending the service or platform; it leans more on people who are likely to believe with Stake rather than someone that has not provided any solid proof that the accusation against him is false or not true. Also, just as Stake or Stunna previously said, the main issue is not about KYC issue (which is true and could be used as supporting evidence that OP is suspicious and likely to do shady things) but rather the match-fixing issue that has been addressed by Stunna and still in an on-going investigation within Stake.

Quote from: PX-Z on Today at 01:56:35 PM

Now, it looks like once a reputed service will always be reputed base on its supporter or whatever they call it, even though it's unreasonable already. Lmao.

Nope, if OP has substantial proofs or evidence, things could likely be the other way around and Stake's reputation could be ruined.