Quote from: dkbit98 on Today at 08:14:07 PM

Royse in headlines... here we go again. Roll Eyes

I really don't understand why he is asking members to beg other members to remove their neutral feedback, it's not the same like negative feedback.
Don't get me wrong, I think people can change but it looks to me that Royse is just making cosmetic changes and nothing more.

Yes, change is constant, but the users stated above are still posting crap. For example, the first user has roughly 10 proof of authentication posts in his most recent 20 posts. Now tell me how the DT is expected to revise tag on such a person.

Quote

PS
Full disclosure, I received one of this message from member who is now in one of campaigns managed by Royse.
I am monitoring posts from this member and I can easily return my neutral feedback.

i have few cases like this in my PM from the gambling board, I've revised some while still monitoring the others. good call.

Quote from: shahzadafzal on Today at 08:46:39 PM

My honest two questions to Royse777.

Well I dont know but that doesnt seem to be two honest questions looks like 4 5 questions to me :p

I have only two honest questions in the OP, if you found something extra its a bug

Quote

Anyway if someone has a neutral trust or even a negative trust and asking them to convince the tagger to get the tag removed, how is it a bad thing?

'convince' is not by sending PMs asking DT to have mercy if you are still doing the same bad habit. improvement = convince.

Quote

Your honest questions and your honest judgments don't add up.

Or am I reading it wrong?

Quote from: Igebotz on Today at 05:19:11 PM

If we're being honest, these users don't deserve even $1 from the crap they post
~
but at the end of the day you are the manager and your decision is final.

Quote from: Igebotz on Today at 07:46:26 PM

like I said before its just an honest question my friend, no hard feelings. Cool

' if we're being honest" is not a judgmental sentence.