I also agree that features like this tend to go unnoticed by most users... Since it'd only benefit desktop users and all of those comments are subjective, then IMO it'd be better to save some space by removing that section.
Ok, I'll start formatting next weekend and post an update here when it's done. 
- Come to think of it, since the usefulness column shows subjective ratings, perhaps something similar should also happen to them. What do you think?
Since it's not taking too much space, I would leave it there but we can include it in the survey as well and ask if Bitcointalk members will have it removed. I've not checked it but hovering might be not possible for mobile devices?
Indeed, it's not working for mobile phones, still I think that if you use this trick at least for the dates (and also make the header more condensed/multiline) you can at least from there squeeze more space. And the comments also.. they're useful, but not crucial, hence one can live without them on mobile.
You are right, maybe we can make a public survey. [...]
But, would it be legitimate to change it? If we change it, everyone would come up and try to change ratings?
In my opinion, we need a public survey to be legitimate.
[...]But, would it be legitimate to change it? If we change it, everyone would come up and try to change ratings?
In my opinion, we need a public survey to be legitimate.
Well, if you want so much to be politically correct, who am I to stop you?
Seriously now, I think it's a good idea. Let's make a poll about it.I'll try to arrange a survey next weekend.
Picture this: we all know that Usain Bolt is fastest man alive, right? Now let's suppose he did not run 100m in 9.58" but in 15". And nobody else would run this distance faster than him. Therefore we would still consider him fastest man alive, right? No matter that he runs 100m in 15" and we actually know that it's possible to do it in 9.58". Does that make sense?
That's true but who knows if there won't be a better sprinter in 10 / 20 / 30 years? 
And in case we'd get a better sprinter, we need some numbers to give out "above" our current top number.
Maybe we can make it like for earthquakes? 1.00 pint increase is 10x inxrease?
Now imagine this analogy regarding Blockchair.
Usain Bolt is retired, isn't he? And I don't beleive, that PrivacyG is a chicken. If so, it would be called ChickenG. And it would be neutral (it).
ChickenG
(By the way, in Romanian chicken is a substantive having also feminine gender 
)
Well ,here we godear GazetaBitcoin. )It seems to be a female chicken.
Nominating PrivacyG at Miss BitcoinTalk category during BCA 2023 would be a legitimate consideration, dear GazetaBitcoin.
Then we must coerce icopress somehow to not cancel this category.
Deleting the emoji??!! 
Are you dense?
We don't delete the emoji, dear GazetaBitcoin!
Are you dense?
We don't delete the emoji, dear GazetaBitcoin!
Pardon my blasphemy
Emoji must stay! Yes, it helps, should be properly formatted now?
Plz confirm, Sirs!
Plz confirm, Sirs!
It seems the 1% trim worked just fine. I noticed the "as" from BitcoinWhosWho, which was not shown earlier, is shown now, as you placed it on the second row. Besides, the "t" from "edit", which was also not shown, appears well now.
1miau, you are tables master! I bow down! Can we have this update implemented in OP now? (I took the screenshot from post #141.)
// blushing (once again)I've copied it into my OP.
I merited your proposal, as this feature of BBcode seems very exotic to me, as I only saw it used very rarely. I like it! However, it comes together with the lack of functionality on mobiles.
I'll include it in our survey as well.