Quote from: X-ray on Today at 03:13:58 PM

Quote from: CryptocurencyKing on Today at 01:07:34 PM

I have a mixed feeling about this short term appointment. But looking at it from the owners perspective, there just 10 games remaining and I think it's a right decision they have made instead of rushing into things not well assessed, it is better you get Lampard as an interim manager as there looking to bring in a good manager slowly. Hopefully he's able to win majority of the remaining games in the PL, and try to finish in the Europa league places. Also, the owners need to make a good decision with the permanent manager. So far, all the decisions made haven't gone anywhere.

Interim manager would be very suitable position for him. lampard got sacked by abramovich caused by he has poor performance with chelsea. I don't even know what aspect that makes todd was signing him back again as caretaker until the end of season.

Here is stats between lampard, tuchel and potter

Lampard

Quote

Lampard had 84 games in charge of Chelsea and managed 44 wins, 15 draws and 25 losses. They scored 171 goals and conceded 116 in that time, meaning the goal difference was 55 and his points per game record was 1.75.

Tuchel

Quote

Tuchel ended his time at Chelsea having reached 99 games. Chelsea won 62 of them, drew 19 and lost 18. They scored 195 times and conceded 105, meaning the goal difference was 90. The points per game record was 2.07, better than Lampard's record.

Potter

Quote

Across Potter's 31 games in charge, he won 12, drew eight and lost 11. The goal difference was poor at just +2 after scoring 33 and conceding 31. The points per game record was a measly 1.42.

https://www.90min.com/posts/frank-lampard-chelsea-record-compared-graham-potter-thomas-tuchel

Basically, potter's stat is not as good as tuchel or lampard but tuchel has a better record compared with lampard. The thing that is acceptable for me is at least lampard was replacing garbage bruno as the former the right hand from potter.

So, Lampard is the only competent manager who can come to the Chelsea owner's thoughts at this particular time when the team required more victories than ever to qualify for the Europa League. This selection of Lampard as interim manager demonstrates how ignorant of football the Chelsea owner is.

It's terrible that the Chelsea Club fell into the hands of someone who chooses coaches based on relationships he has had in the past with them, and I question why he chose Potter and now Lampard, given the circumstances of Chelsea being in the premier league and the sacking of Lampard by the previous owner.