Post
Topic
Board Wallet software
Re: WasabiWallet.io | Open-source, non-custodial Bitcoin Wallet for desktop
by
Kruw
on 13/04/2023, 18:05:04 UTC
I already proved you were lying about being able identify the outputs of a WabiSabi coinjoin, remember?
I have already shown you blockchain evidence of the following:

Wasabi coinjoins creating outputs which can be 100% linked to a specific input: https://mempool.space/tx/dae13b2d015587a3033d7ab7949a7efa6d6ed7aa782168b0651ab37a2d8390f8

Whale outputs that don't receive privacy on the blockchain aren't displayed as private in the client either, what's your point?  Where's the flaw?  You're not providing a criticism against WabiSabi coinjoins at all, your criticism is that amounts on Bitcoin are not cryptographically blinded, which means a larger amount cannot be hidden within a smaller amount no matter what coinjoin protocol is used.  Period.

Wasabi coinjoins reusing addresses, leading to users being doxxed: https://nitter.it/ErgoBTC/status/1585671294783311872
Wasabi coinjoins using the same address on both sides of a transaction: https://mempool.space/tx/af50a27691c0f0b7b626cddb74445a0e26bb6ed7b045861067326ea173bc17d0 (address bc1qft2uze947wtdvvhdqtx00c8el954y6ekxjk73h)

You keep repeating this and I keep having to direct you to the Bitcoin whitepaper:

Here's a lovely example of Wasabi reusing addresses, which led to the user in question being doxxed: https://nitter.it/ErgoBTC/status/1585671294783311872

Here's the Bitcoin whitepaper again since you seemed to miss it the first time I posted it:

Everyone already knows you shouldn't reuse addresses, it's in the Bitcoin whitepaper:

As an additional firewall, a new key pair should be used for each transaction to keep them from being linked to a common owner. Some linking is still unavoidable with multi-input transactions, which necessarily reveal that their inputs were owned by the same owner. The risk is that if the owner of a key is revealed, linking could reveal other transactions that belonged to the same owner.

For you then to provide a single example which works well does absolutely nothing to address the fact in many cases Wasabi coinjoins are critically flawed. As per my previous analogy, a car manufacturer showing a new model which works well does not excuse previous models which have randomly burst in to flames. This is an incredibly simple concept, so I can only assume you are trolling by continuing to deliberately misunderstand it.

Go on, tell me how Wasabi coinjoins are "critically flawed".  Don't hold back, I want to know what's wrong with them.

Again, you are repeating a malicious lie.  Wasabi users cannot be surveilled because their wallet addresses are masked by client side block filters and their IP address is masked with Tor.
Yes yes, you've repeated this meaningless soundbite a dozen times now. You pay a blockchain analysis company for information on every single UTXO which attempts to register for a coinjoin. You actively support mass surveillance.

Why does it matter if a coordinator buys data from someone else?  The objective of a privacy wallet is to prevent the coordinator from SELLING their data.  It's possible for the coordinator to collect and sell blockchain data for Samourai, Joinmarket, and all the custodial mixers you have promoted in your signature, but coordinators of Wasabi coinjoins cannot surveil their users thanks to default usage of Tor and client side block filters.