Quote from: joker_josue on Today at 08:47:52 AM

Quote from: NotATether on Today at 08:38:13 AM

I guess now I'm going to be using JARPI as an AI-buster:

Look, I think this idea is better than answering questions!

But, based on the automatic text, I had a doubt:
Do you first manually validate the AI's suspicion and then post, or does it post automatically?
Or are you the one who suspects a topic, and puts the JARPI to analyze which then makes the post in case of a positive result?

Third option is correct. I ran OP's text through many AI detectors and all of them gave AI-generated indicators, so I fired up JARPI to send the warning.

Quote from: nutildah on Today at 08:50:06 AM

I have to ask out of curiosity, and due to my own thread on the issue, which AI detectors are you going to use, and how are you weighing the results? Are there different levels of likeliness, or will it only post replies in threads that come back as "highly likely" to be AI-generated?

I use at least three different AI checking websites. Or more than three if even one of them doubts that the text is not completely AI-generated. I do not use the GPTZero website - I had too many false positives with it.