Are you going to manually look for suspected AI posts, do manual scanning, and check whether or not it's AI created before triggering JARPI to act? I thought JARPI was meant to be a bot conducting this errand for you rather than you running the errand? What's the point if there's still a bunch of shitwork for you to do?
This is a new idea, so the automation has not been coded in yet. I would definitely like to automate the AI detection part sooner or later.
Third option is correct. I ran OP's text through many AI detectors and all of them gave AI-generated indicators, so I fired up JARPI to send the warning.
So basically you browse the forum normally, and when you think an OP was made by AI, you submit the topic for JARPI analysis.
Then it will analyze and if it concludes that the text was generated by AI, it will post the ad. This is it?
Thus, you stop worrying about analyzing these cases in detail, and you can continue to browse the forum normally looking for other cases. Seems to be an interesting tool, to free your time from those boring analyses.
Honestly, I find this option much more useful and interesting than answering repetitive topics.
That's basically correct, but see my reply to borovichok. I'm eventually going to have this run through all newly created topics and run the detection automatically (using an API to some websites or Selenium).
Aren't you the same person whitelisting them back to the forum now? how many of those users became a big part of the forum well I don't expect you to answer
Sorry Op for going off-topic
I don't know why but I feel like you are trying to trigger him (good try). None of them are paid jobs. He is doing it voluntarily and he is not responsible for what they do after. Most of His whitelisted users doing good. He often posts the Ban %. If you are trying to trigger him, I am sorry but he is unlikely to pay attention to you as he proved himself as a thick-skinned gang leader.
We were just having a chat and he felt it wasn't the proper place because it was a little off-topic from the OP, I simply made my perspective plain to him, it's nothing personal, and BTW, we're still on the same track. Leave it to the moderator to decide and quit pressing.
This is somewhat preferable to the previous plan, but my concern is what would happen if everyone disregards the JAPI response and proceeds with their discussion regardless of whether it was generated by AI or not, similar to this post
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5448187.msg62145641#msg62145641. Since there are currently no explicit forum rules against AI and no 99% proved AI detector tools, nobody appears to care and the moderator won't lock a thread just because JAPI says so. there is a light at the end of the tunnel but the challenges looks bigger.
I guess I'll have the bot file a report every 24 hoursw for a period of 2 weeks, or until the thread is locked. Whichever comes first.