Quote from: nutildah on Today at 10:13:02 AM

..........

So I mean the posts aren't good. They are bland, uninformative and perfunctory -- par for the shitposter course. But I don't think they are necessarily AI-generated. If they were, the poster changed enough of the wording to make them not appear that they were and undetectable to most (some?) of the detectors.

Not strong enough evidence to assume these are AI-generated posts IMO.

There was a report on the usage of AI by one participant in the Stake.com campaign

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4440941.msg62156867#msg62156867

The user is still in the campaign and one of the Stake's management addressed this concern

Quote from: ogamibr on May 03, 2023, 05:20:24 AM

Hello everyone,

I'm Ogami and I've joined Stake's Campaign Management Team since last October.

So far, I have been checking anything related to AI as well as daily posts. You should always take into consideration that these are not 100% accurate and you have to use more than one tool (even chatgpt has one from his own site), along with the human factor and common sense because sometimes we have the so-called "false positives".

We caught one because he admitted to using AIs'

Quote from: bbigtart on May 28, 2023, 02:50:48 PM

I admit that I was wrong. I used AI ChatGPT at first I didn't know it was strictly banned in forums. But these few days I just found out, coupled with this incident I also realized that what I did was wrong and fatal.

Everyone has a concern that they are going to be flagged for using AI although they are not using AI, we need a reliable tool to detect AI.