Quote from: abowakawa on Today at 12:35:42 PM

Oh, please. Give me a break.

You can't say that for many years now the SEC hasn't operated as a quasi protection racket for the US gov. If you can't recognize that, why are you even in crypto? Musk is best known, among many others, for publicly saying as much.

They operate with in-house judges. You can't fight them. And the case you've posted yet again... there are so many absent details. Still, on top of that, the SEC forces the accused to sign a gag order so they can't defend themselves in public.

Get a grip man.

Setting aside your passive aggression yet again, I would have agreed the Dynex PyTorch would be a great time to reveal since it will probably be very hands on.

Again, for your own credibility, feel free to tell us how you and your friends are personally driven to spend hours sniping at a small-time project at the exclusion of all others.

No need to resort to conspiracy theories and innuendo to question our credibility.

As stated there is nothing but the publicly available information outlined on these messages. This is to make sure this information is available for reference in case it proves to be useful in the future. There is no malice, just the issues that raise suspicion on the Dynex project and Daniel Mattes' involvement for us.

All this criticism is wiped out simply by letting industry experts vet the DynexSolve technology in public, as you agreed to.