Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on May 13, 2023, 03:03:58 PM

It's not that I am not aware. Of course I am aware but why don't you consider the response from the license providers too?

I did consider the response from the license provider. I consider it bullshit. In 10 + years I've never seen or even heard of curacao helping a player or actually investigating. The only time I can think of them speaking up about any sort of dispute is when they defended 1xbit. (1xbit was ultimately forced into bankruptcy after breifly having it overruled, which was when curacao made that statement)

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on May 13, 2023, 03:03:58 PM

Do you really think I am defending a specific casino?

Yes. You're defending coinplay. You're doing it this very post. By bringing up all the way OP could be guilty, or making it seem like the statement from their license holder somehow justifies anything.

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on May 13, 2023, 03:03:58 PM

Since you asked [not sure why] then let me ask the same. Don't you think you are defending the OP blindly? Defending him just because he posted something which looks like legit to you but truth is you and I can not prove if that is indeed legit. Haven't we seen such accusations all the time against other casinos? Common accusations:

Casino x banned my account
Casino x confiscated my deposit
Casino x not responding to my PMs
Casino x is a scam
Casino x is 1xbit
Casino x do not pay my winning.

The entire scan accusation filled with such type of threads but it seems all your focus is one defending OP and seeing a specific casino should go down to the hole.
Why?

I've participated in many scam accusation threads.

I'm defending OP because of the way coinplay has handled the situation.

They agreed to use askgamblers. Askgamblers ruled in favor of OP. Coinplay didn't pay and just stopped posting.

Let me say that again:

They agreed to use askgamblers.

Askgamblers ruled in favor of OP.

Coinplay didn't pay and just stopped posting.