Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 11:26:29 AM

Of course. Just as denying to mix SBF's coins isn't censorship, because he's a criminal! Roll Eyes

Denying SBF's coins is censorship, and he is a criminal. This response about SBF has nothing to do with the proof about Samourai's deceptive practices against the Bitcoin community. Don't you think that it's really dishonest for Samourai's developer to use multiple social media accounts to do things like collect BTC from giveaways multiple times? And respond vouching for his own service?

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 11:26:29 AM

What a satisfactory conclusion. I'm quite acknowledging the downsides of custodial mixers, though. Forfeiting ownership of your coins, first and foremost. In comparison with you, who's avoiding the outright lies, the evidence from address reuse, the partnership with blockchain analysis firm, etc., the list is quite endless.

The WabiSabi coinjoin protocol has nothing to do with "outright lies", "evidence from address reuse" "the partnership with blockchain analysis firm", it's just a way anyone can make their Bitcoins private without anyone (including the coinjoin coordinator) being able to determine which outputs belong to which inputs: https://mempool.space/tx/0529be836bb49d14f1e4462012c32248b64145c0fb257fe300499e9bd76f0893

I keep posting examples of WabiSabi coinjoins being used to make coins private in a non custodial way, yet you are still advertising custodial services that can deanonymize their users and steal their money instead.

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 11:26:29 AM

WabiSabi, at the time writing this, can only be used practically via zkSNACKs' coordinator, which is supporter of mass surveillance.

This isn't true, the WabiSabi coordinator zkSNACKs uses is completely open source, it can be enabled in one click and used by anyone: https://i.imgur.com/V4K7Xkj.png