Quote from: Learn Bitcoin on Today at 10:13:10 AM

[...]
After this response, Rollbit Razer did not reply on this case anymore while the accuser is suspected of abusing the Rakeback system. They were placing bets on low-odd matches to wager and claim bonuses or something. The problem is Rollbit Razer did not share what he abused.
[...]

Thank you for the summary, it pretty much summed things up --to an extent-- of the entire case of Rollbit v. Stakemeharder. However, you missed a point where Razer did gave a reply, though indirectly. Rollbit and Razer did not let the case hang dry. He replied to my PM for the case and which they agreed to solve it through a platform where they can freely provide evidences without having a concern of accidentally revealing their security secrets and detection techniques. And the platform that they recommended is the highest one: their very own licensor. As per the PM of I have the permission to share to public,

Quote from: holydarkness on June 19, 2023, 10:08:08 AM

[...]

Quote from: Rollbit Razer on June 19, 2023, 05:54:37 PM

Hey there,

Appreciate you following up about this.

Please feel free to share our response here within the thread.

If OP wishes to send a complaint to our licensor, this can be done via complaints@gaming-curacao.com

Our team will respond promptly to such requests.

Thanks,
Razer

Hope this helps.

Now, to address OP's allegation that Hhampuz use his position to vindicate scam, where the content of the thread refers to Rollbit, which implies the scam being referred on the title is Rollbit, with scam accusations against Rollbit as the basis of the argument. I wrote a nice list about it that happened and piled during Razer's short hiatus:

Quote from: holydarkness on June 23, 2023, 11:31:52 AM

[...]
So, to summarize and reflect to the latest situation, accusations about Rollbit are as follows:
1. Rollbit - scam 5k - GDPR PROBLEM
2. ~~Rollbit disables account and seizes funds (10.2k)!~~ - pending for CEG's decision
3. ~~Community Warning - Rollbit ⚠️~~
4. ~~Rollbit hold funds and ignore in chat~~
5. ~~scam warning rollbit.com banned my account~~
6. ~~rollbit scam (255 USDT)~~
[...]

If I may tweak that list according to the latet update, case number 1 might as good as closed given the OP of that case never say anything anymore, so most likely they tried to abuse and found that they can't win [I'll level with you that I barely remember the case], and case number 2... of which mentioned above as Rollbit v. Stakemeharder, I made an error by referring them to CEG instead of GC, but everything is back on track. Stakemeharder had submitted his complaint and most likely GC [GamingCuracao, not CG, CasinoGuru] is in the middle of it.

And if I may add case number 7, Rollbit Stealing $10k from me, or we can probably refer it to Rollbit v. goodboyshams to avoid confusion as the amount is quite similar, Razer has also gave their stance for it, again, through my exchange of PM with him,

Quote from: holydarkness on July 26, 2023, 05:06:08 PM

[...]
Edit: Got a reply from Razer, Rollbit is more than willing to cooperate and answer to any third party addressing this issue. Given there's no ADR that's suitable for this case [sportsbetting related] you can escalate it to complaints@gaming-curacao.com. Please note that the ruling made by the master license holder is final and binding to both parties, so both parties has to honor the final decision made by GC.

"Bottomline", "what I tried to say", "tl;dr:", "in short", whatever this next sentence serves: IMO this thread is somewhat baseless. To accuse Hhampuz of vindicating a scammer --in this case, Rollbit-- by leaving positive feedback to "counter" the negatives, the scammer themselves need to be proven as a scammer, thus the accusation/statement/question will have its weight, while what happens here is the opposite. Rollbit tackles the accusations against them in their best capacity without having to jeopardize their system. And when they can't, they'll redirect the complainant to their master license holder.

Will the last two cases rule in favor to the accuser or will it rule in favor to Rollbit is yet to be reached. But so far, evidences suggested that Rollbit did not scam their customer by confiscating funds without strong basis, thus, an idea that they're a scammer is yet to have a final say. And thus, an idea that Hhampuz use his position to vindicate scams [Rollbit] is also yet to have a final say. Thus, ultimately, baseless. Or, at the very least, premature.

Might be wise to mention here, though it's probably useless, that the trust system did not work like how it used to be. One Neg and one Pos does not negate each other, they still shows as a separate score.

Oh, and before anyone accuse me of siding with Rollbit --or Hhampuz, although that one is quite far fetched-- I think anyone who frequently visit scam accusations board will notice I haunt that board on daily basis to a point that probably Cyrus got bored of seeing me [LOL]. I tried my best to mediate disputes at best of my capacity there. When a user proven to be cheated, I'll agree with it, and when the opposite thing happen where a user tried to manipulate "The Neutrals" by driving certain narrative --if I may borrow yahoo's words, "the accuser usually isn't sharing the whole story. They're sharing the part that makes them look like they were scammed."-- I'll make it clear too.