Quote from: DireWolfM14 on Today at 03:47:38 PM

. I left that post in Poker Player's thread rather brief on purpose, because there seems to be this attitude among some DT members than anyone with an undisclosed alt is up to something nefarious. I find that assumption simply absurd.

As do I.

As I said to The Sceptical Chymist they are critical of other user's trust feedbacks yet of their own 3,050+ trust feedbacks there are many of the type they are critical of. I have given examples of more than a dozen at a time The Sceptical Chymist has done, so they are not isolated incidents. I have suggested The Sceptical Chymist needs to trim their own trust feedbacks down to about 400 maximum using the ten questions I posed a couple of weeks ago.

This is the type of negative trust feedback others have started threads against me in the past then the DT echo chamber sings in a lipsinc chorus...

Quote

Incorrigible, entitled troll and spammer insisting on being given a loan despite the only collateral he claims to have to offer is an obsolete iPhone that's not worth the amount he wants to borrow, and stolen or hacked identification documents of others.

A similar post

Quote

Troll seeking attention, and obviously an account of someone who's trust is already ruined.

May I suggest again that you go back and review your own 344 trust feedbacks, please based on my post to The Sceptical Chymist, please?

With regards to negatives on alts I can only suggest you look back over the last few pages as the issue came up and each of us has chimed in to remind a newer contributor that having alts does not mean they are out to scam.

Any negative trust feedback on alts has been where there is a solid connection for claiming in a campaign etc.

Feel free to review ALL of my ~350 trust feedback and tell me where they are wrong.