Quote from: Kruw on Today at 08:13:50 PM

It literally was my initial warning

Correct, but you have also said that it links your transactions no matter what, and that transaction links are created by Whirlpool coinjoins, both of which are incorrect.

Quote from: Kruw on September 04, 2023, 11:56:21 AM

It links your transactions no matter which coin you consolidate it with

Quote from: Kruw on September 04, 2023, 02:26:30 PM

I continue to quote the post where I traced the Whirlpool transaction you provided because people need to be aware of the transaction links created by Whirlpool coinjoins that can be avoided by using WabiSabi coinjoins.

Now please can we stick to the point and not to semantics?

Quote from: satscraper on Today at 08:16:22 PM

A man sends his coins to exchange E and receives different coins C after a while. In your opinion, this is a bad practice

Yes, because an exchange isn't designed to offer on-chain privacy.

Quote from: satscraper on Today at 08:16:22 PM

On the other hand, if a man sends his coins to a dedicated mixer M, and M sends those coins to the same exchange E, getting the same coins C back and then sending them back to the man, you consider it good practice.

MixTum says they're mixing your coins with investors' coins. I'm not sure about the exact procedure they follow, I don't believe they're just randomly selecting an exchange and sending your coins there, under their full name. You can ask them that question in the appropriate thread. I am not obligated to provide an answer, nor am I able to.