Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 04:22:15 PM

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 04:10:38 PM

Why do you keep asking me rhetorical questions?

Why do you keep ignoring the points everyone has made about zkSNACKs, the company responsible for the prosperity of Wasabi?

I've never ignored anyone's points, I've directly addressed everyone's points by offering an immediate solution: Copy and paste zkSNACKs' open source coordinator code. They literally did all the work for you, their business can be yours with CTRL + C, and yet, the losers on this thread are instructing people not to use Wasabi at all.

The reason you refuse to accept this solution is because you would not be able to steal anyone's coins if you ran a coordinator. As you've already established from your collaborations with Chipmixer, Whirlwind.Money, and Betnomi, you understand that stealing users' coins is a crucial part of the business model that allows them to pay you such massive rates for luring new victims.

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on Today at 04:22:15 PM

Quote from: Kruw on Today at 04:10:38 PM

No one at any point suggested that Bitcoin would have problems if zkSNACKs disappeared.

I mean, aren't you tired lying yet? In the blacklisting blog post, it literally says that if zkSNACKs were discontinued, Bitcoin's privacy would be a lot worse.

Quote from: https://blog.wasabiwallet.io/zksnacks-blacklisting-update/

We are fully aware of the gravity of our actions and had been even before the decision was made. By exploiting the only architectural flaw of Wasabi Wallet’s non-anonymously run coordinator: lack of censorship resistance; we broke one of the largest taboos of Bitcoin: blacklisting, to achieve something greater: survival of the best Bitcoin privacy technology. In doing this, we are giving Bitcoin’s anonymity a chance to thrive. The alternative, discontinuing zkSNACKs would have set back Bitcoin privacy for decades.

They've literally meant that if the default coordinator is shut down, the Bitcoin's privacy, other coordinators included, will be set back for decades.

I agree Bitcoin privacy would be worse given zkSNACKs huge investments into it over the past 7 years. But that wasn't the question pmalek asked, was it?

Quote from: Pmalek on September 13, 2023, 03:46:20 PM

Not only that, but Kruw keeps highligting that the software and code is open-source, so why would there be a problem for Bitcoin if zkSNACKs disappeared tomorrow? I know why I am asking this, lets see if Kruw takes the bait or dodges the question.

As you can see, he dropped the word "Privacy" from the claim and then smugly called his statement "bait" to see if I would notice. I noticed, but you did not, apparently.