Quote from: pawel7777 on Today at 07:52:27 AM

Quote from: avp2306 on October 22, 2023, 10:14:13 PM

People might act that again if lightlord will pay late but lets give a benefit of the doubt that this time is different since he already say that no delayed of payments will happen again.

I don't think there's any real risk of that happening again, since he decided to use a trusted campaign manager and escrowed funds. But I guess that would depend on what the manager will do if the escrowed funds run out, will he pause the campaign or ask participants to continue.

That being said, the escrow balance as per the campaign thread is already zero Undecided

Quote from: CryptopreneurBrainboss on October 17, 2023, 02:32:11 AM

Bitvest Escrow Address: bc1q00pyv4twqzj88525e2pfypf4m4d9kmpkgyqpje
Current balance:

Looks like it has been used to pay some of the participants, with the remaining balance going to bc1q3m87ma5g9jg876wqyz3sh8j5cu3tux8mfye20f (change address?)

Quote from: FinneysTrueVision on Today at 03:01:27 AM

I have previously invested in four different gambling tokens. One turned out to be a scam, another one died quickly, and two others got dumped and their price took a nosedive. I'm sure the thought has crossed their mind but doing it in a way that doesn't result in disappointment would be hard to pull off especially in a period when small cap altcoins are struggling as Bitcoin's dominance has been increasing for many months.

Since BitVest allows investors to invest in the bankroll directly (with bitcoins or other crypto), I don't see what would be the point of launching any token.

The campaign manger didn't know how to use without change address, in the Bitvest campaign
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UaMGX7-U0OqnP8p0_efY6YHjpwSJqDi6yUE64K949MI/

You can see: "0.0180245 BTC" has been payed out, so 0.1760385 BTC wouldn't go to zero right away.

I have explained to the campaign manager on how to use without change addresses in PM, so it should be good now.