I guess if a post is of extremely low quality and it shows that the person making it didn't read even the first page of the thread, report it to the mods (as was already suggested). Low/zero-value posts should be reported anyway.
I'm not talking about those posts. If you go to the two examples I have compiled, neither of them are low value or off topic. The first is on topic because it answers the question but by answering without reading robelneo's answer it is assuming something that has already been shown to be false. The second case is neither low value nor off topic, which is redundant because you haven't read what the OP himself said a few comments later on the first page.
The ones that are reportable I will report and the ones that are like these cases I will compile.
Very interesting I may not agree with you creating a thread for this, but you do have a valid reason for BlackBoss_ case on that discussion I have presented the fact based on the article I provided, @BitDane already quoted me on that fact, if BlackBoss_ only read those quoted post by @Bitdane then he will not base his posts based on assumption, obviously, he only relies on OP's thread.
Obviously, BlackBoss_ is not subscribed to the Bitcointalk bot, if he is, he will address your call out and maybe delete his thread or apologize, what's your take if you call out the member and he did apologize or delete his thread will he still be part of your report?