Quote from: holydarkness on Today at 10:11:52 AM

Quote from: dplay on November 29, 2023, 08:18:19 PM

I'd like to confirm that BC.Game have indeed paid me an additional 46k. It's nice to see they're alive and kicking, they might not be going under after all.

Seeing they're committed to work on their reputation here, I'd like to use the opportunity and ask them to comment on the initial confiscation of my funds on the basis of faulty BJ play. To remind everyone, BC.Game's claim is the following:

[image snip]

So they claim I played a game which had RTP above 100%, yet they also admit I lost money playing it. That's why they decided to void all my bets and refund my deposits.

In the interest of fairness and transparency, I ask of them to comment in detail the alleged exploit in the rules. Considering they now claim the game is "fixed" there is no security reason why they wouldn't be able to comment.

Please explain to the community why you confiscated over 3btc from my account. Thanks.

I am moving your post from other thread here to give more context:

Quote from: dplay on November 29, 2023, 08:21:37 PM

I'd like to remind everyone that they confiscated my funds as they felt I should've lost more money gambling. I do not consider my issue with them resolved. Details here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5471569.msg63242609#msg63242609 .

Now, it looks like greed, is it not?

I gave your complaints another read and the case can actually be appropriately marked as closed within the first complaint, with USDT 124,637, this is the deal they offered and which you accepted. Granted, you ask for it to be in BTC, but they didn't actually and explicitly accept this term,

And further, you both seal the deal with them sending the agreed fund and you explicitly said, "yes, this is acceptable".

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this should mark the situation as resolved and you should've voided the right to ask for more. Yet they somehow provide more for you as a show of good gesture, to match your demand. And you seemingly see it as a weakness and try to exploit it by demanding an explanation for 3 btc and [once again] do not consider your issue as resolved.

Tell me I read this wrongly?

Quote from: Russtie Beerkan on Today at 03:25:50 AM

Burden of proof lies with the accuser.
If BC accuse OP of an exploit, they should prove it.

Read again, they made a deal and agree to settle. The burden of proof no longer applies.

BC.Game Support, I think you don't have to meet this demand. As provided above, the case should've been marked as closed due to OP's own acknowledgement.

I've already explained that I've settled the AG complaint as I felt it prudent to get any money out as quickly as I can.

The fact remains they voided all my play as they felt I should've lost more than I did. They mention an exploit but refuse to prove it.