Quote from: nutildah on December 24, 2023, 10:29:12 AM

Quote from: ETFbitcoin on December 24, 2023, 09:45:53 AM

And as i stated on different thread, not many people bother opening LN channel when it costs them several dollars to do so.

If you have a business that depends on making several Bitcoin transactions a day, and you're stuck in a high fee environment that appears to be prolonged, wouldn't it be more cost efficient to pay a really big fee once rather than several big fees for an indeterminate amount of time?

Several major exchanges will swap your BTC for LN or Liquid BTC for a zero % charge.

That's true, but i also expect not many Bitcoiner create lots of Bitcoin transaction. Aside from business, i expect only daily trader would take benefit from using LN.

Quote from: BlackHatCoiner on December 24, 2023, 03:02:30 PM

I very much like the sarcasm of that guy.

Quote from: stompix on December 22, 2023, 03:23:02 PM

What really irks me lately on this forum is some sheeple acceptance of everything, hundreds clapping for the rules, obey the rules, we must wait for the others to take a decision, a lot of fake unicorn farts drug induce stance where we should all act like sheep and wait peacefully while grassing out faith, not daring to come out and say: THIS IS F*** UP!

Because, we are all upset. I mean, who could have predicted that a wave of dumbasses would flow the mempool with gigabytes of crap images, deeming the on-chain transactions useless? I'm pretty confident we all expected Ordinals to have ended months now, but hey; it's close to a year and people still buy that nonsense. Unbelievable.

Rising the block size in a regulated manner to make this "confiscation" of block space more expensive sounds like a valid argument, but you were here in 2015-2017. Wanna repeat the era that gave birth to every failed fork of Bitcoin? I would rather not.

But aside from BCH, most other fork only join hype ride where people got excited from obtaining "free" forked coin.