Quote from: desarpenteur on Today at 03:33:30 PM

Quote from: franky1 on Today at 03:20:46 PM

Quote from: desarpenteur on Today at 03:18:54 PM

Would you consider it censorship to make it impossible to carry out a transaction where the fee is higher than the overall sum (which would mechanically prevent BRC20 inscriptions) ?

the use of the word censorship is overly abused.. without any context of understanding of the word
when in contrast core dev love the words
eviction, rejection, drop, abandon, pruning, banning

bitcoin always had policies to not allow certain transactions/data..
.. in recent years they relaxed the rules which ended up with more junk. not a better system

And is it technically feasible to make it impossible to carry out a transaction where the fee would be higher than the overall sum (which would mechanically prevent BRC20 registrations) ?

its feasible to implement a fee formulae tier system where transactions using certain opcodes pay multiples of base fee estimate rate
after all legacy pays more then segwit. and thats without any block rejection enforcement..