Quote from: Poker Player on Today at 04:14:56 AM

Quote from: monkgg on May 12, 2024, 04:21:45 AM

Paying 2% one time at the swap one time is much different than paying a traditional house-edge on each bet.

I don't see that it is so different because to the 2% of the one time swap you have to add the risk of holding a shitcoin like that, which usually tends to 0.

Quote from: monkgg on May 12, 2024, 04:21:45 AM

The second image is illogical. The more bets the more the balance should be equal to the initial one and not a profit. If you are going to claim that this is the result of the simulation, you could put another one that shows losses or make the sample larger (the larger the sample, the more the final balance should tend to the initial one).

Poker Player, obviously paying a one time fee versus a fee every iteration is cheaper. Use your common sense.