Quote from: Marykeller on Today at 12:01:15 PM

Quote from: pusaka on Today at 07:44:37 AM

Quote from: BitcoinHunt3r on June 30, 2024, 11:53:05 PM

Personally, I think the problem is both and indeed yeah the coach is probably the main factor, when the new coach is unable to make all the players into a solid team then the results are not optimal. Apart from that, Chelsea management also has the same role in Chelsea's failures in the last few seasons, they are impatient and want to see instant results while sometimes coaches need more time to change the team for the better.

The coach will be the first person to blame when a team fails to perform well, but we also have to see how Chelsea management always makes hasty decisions regarding their coach. The reason is that they don't give the coach much time, in fact they only give the coach one season and then they fire him.
Many teams fail in their first season with their coach, but in their second season many finally make good progress and now Chelsea is not doing that.
Pochettino, for example, had to be fired at the end of this season, even though in terms of his game I think he could show progress, Chelsea were not satisfied so they fired him. It is very difficult for a coach if he is only given a very short time.

Every given solution lies on Enzo to provide by making Chelsea formidable with the players available. Let's see what he can truly offer as Chelsea's head coach "good or poor performance".
I trust Chelsea management not to have Enzo stay more than a season if they didn't see Chelsea appear at the top of the Premier League table at the end of this forthcoming season in few weeks time.

Chelsea management are currently busy signing new players and letting some other old players to go on loan or been sold out. Enzo gonna be building the Chelsea team from scratch, leaving Pochettino tactics aside to come up with a new team tactics of play to dominate every match like Manchester City or Arsenal

The biggest problem that I can see with Chelsea is that they are changing the coaches like they are changing pages on Calendar. lol. Tongue

Just give someone enough time at least. Another thing, I don’t know if someone else has noticed this or not, but Chelsea has been choosing coaches that doesn’t make sense. They probably had a chance to get Zidane or Luis Enrique when they got Graham Potter. So that decision did not make much sense to me. And every coach that comes in the managerial position of Chelsea starts to spend money like crazy.

I guess they have to do that because they need their own players according to their own tactics. But the problem is sometimes those expensive players do not perform at all. I really thought that when the last coach, Pochettino, was bringing in good results they were going to give him more time. What’s the point if you keep changing the coach by not even giving him one year?